WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between species richness and productivity is fundamental to the management and preservation of biodiversity. Yet despite years of study and intense theoretical interest, this relationship remains controversial. Here, we present the results of a literature survey in which we examined the relationship between species richness and productivity in 171 published studies. We extracted the raw data from published tables and graphs and subjected these data to a standardized analysis, using ordinary least‐squares (OLS) regression and generalized linear‐model (GLIM) regression to test for significant positive, negative, or curvilinear relationships between productivity and species diversity. If the relationship was curvilinear, we tested whether the maximum (or minimum) of the curve occurred within the range of productivity values observed (i.e., was there evidence of a hump?). A meta‐analysis conducted on the distribution of standardized quadratic regression coefficients showed that the average quadratic coefficient was negative (i.e., the average species richness–productivity relationship was curvilinear and decelerating), and that the distribution of standardized quadratic regression coefficients was significantly heterogeneous (i.e., the studies did not sample the same underlying species richness–productivity relationship). Looking more closely at the patterns of productivity–diversity relationships, we found that, for vascular plants at geographical…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship of species richness with trophic state is not linear, but rather quadratic with peak species richness at moderate levels of productivity and lower richness as productivity increases or decreases.
“Recent studies on species diversity and lake productivity suggest the relationship of species richness with trophic state is not linear, but rather quadratic with peak species richness at moderate levels of productivity and lower richness as productivity increases or decreases (e.g., Rosenzwieg and Abramsky 1993, Dodson et al. 2000, Mittelbach et al. 2001).”
From Assessment of the Onondaga Lake, New York, fish community following reductions of nutrient inputs from a wastewater treatment plant (2015) · cites this paper as Mittelbach et al. 2001
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 114 · Cited by 1,650
- Authors
- Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I., & Gough, L.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2381-2396
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008811990
- Cited by
- 1,650
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 83
- FWCI
- 54.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- National Center For Environmental Assessment
- Division of Environmental Biology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- species richness–productivity relationship, biodiversity, vascular plants, animal biodiversity, community boundaries, plant biomass, aquatic ecosystems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review